| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Date: | 2021-04-06 14:01:05 |
| Message-ID: | 988f2f72-d5a8-3ff0-3b12-265f10a9e205@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/04/06 20:44, David Steele wrote:
> On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
>>> but it was not necessary.
>>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
>>
>> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
>> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version atfirst.
>> Then we can improve the docs if required.
>
> +1
Thanks! So I pushed the patch.
On 2021/04/06 20:48, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> Yes, please. What I suggested is almost same as your idea.
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2021-04-06 14:05:09 | Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-04-06 13:52:40 | Re: Allow batched insert during cross-partition updates |