| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Date: | 2021-04-06 11:44:13 |
| Message-ID: | 548532b5-0fc8-09f7-6886-68db75242830@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
>> but it was not necessary.
>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
>
> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at
> first.
> Then we can improve the docs if required.
+1
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-04-06 11:48:00 | RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2021-04-06 11:19:26 | Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function |