Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Kyotaro Horiguchi'" <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date: 2021-04-06 20:01:44
Message-ID: 1377203.1617739304@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks! So I pushed the patch.

Seems like the test case added by this commit is not
working on Windows.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Lynch 2021-04-06 20:16:16 Re: policies with security definer option for allowing inline optimization
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-04-06 19:15:56 Re: PostgreSQL log query's result size