| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, gkokolatos(at)pm(dot)me, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Allow batched insert during cross-partition updates |
| Date: | 2021-04-06 13:52:40 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACWV_xjb8Y9B9AdmcRc=xm_0noMd=F7CEvgB5A9xRos+zQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 6:37 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 3) will the cmin in the output always be the same?
> > +SELECT cmin, * FROM batch_cp_upd_test3;
>
> TBH, I am not so sure. Maybe it's not a good idea to rely on cmin
> after all. I've rewritten the tests to use a different method of
> determining if a single or multiple insert commands were used in
> moving rows into foreign partitions.
Thanks! It looks good!
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-04-06 14:01:05 | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-04-06 13:43:49 | Re: Can we remove extra memset in BloomInitPage, GinInitPage and SpGistInitPage when we have it in PageInit? |