Re: Packages: Again

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-11 19:56:23
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1701112055060.11499@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
> porting --- there was just no way to port it.
>
> Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.

Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-01-11 20:01:30 Re: Packages: Again
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-01-11 19:54:34 Re: Packages: Again