| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Packages: Again |
| Date: | 2017-01-11 20:01:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20170111200130.GN18360@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fabien,
* Fabien COELHO (coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr) wrote:
> >I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> >than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> >couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
> >porting --- there was just no way to port it.
> >
> >Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.
>
> Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?
Yes.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-11 20:05:02 | Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-01-11 19:56:23 | Re: Packages: Again |