| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Packages: Again |
| Date: | 2017-01-11 20:09:20 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDRbGcpQ6sWaSrybzT_Ay7C7izX3fNUzRu-0Jy52rf3Qw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2017-01-11 20:56 GMT+01:00 Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>:
>
> I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
>> than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
>> couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of
>> porting --- there was just no way to port it.
>>
>> Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.
>>
>
> Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?
>
There is relative well working workaround - ora2pg is able to translate it
to dblink usage.
Sure - native solution can be better - usage pg_background is step forward.
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Fabien.
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2017-01-11 20:16:07 | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2017-01-11 20:08:58 | Re: Packages: Again |