Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Mircea Cadariu <cadariu(dot)mircea(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pierrick Chovelon <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals
Date: 2025-10-27 23:30:51
Message-ID: aQAAq3HmFIYEo3HG@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 12:34:56PM +0100, Mircea Cadariu wrote:
> So far so good!

Yes, the buildfarm has not been complaining.

> About the main issue, seems to me the consensus is that dropping unnamed
> portals more aggressively is the way to go?

At the cost of one extra hash table lookup, that unlikely does not
matter for performance anyway. I guess so.

It's not something that can be backpatched. We need to make sure that
the documentation about an unnamed portal drop happening on a
follow-up BIND query is fixed. If somebody would like to send a
refresh patch, including for how the tests change, that would be
welcome here.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-10-27 23:35:15 Re: [PATCH] pg_bsd_indent: improve formatting of multiline comments
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-10-27 23:27:35 Re: Remove specific \r\n code in TAP for Windows