Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals

From: Mircea Cadariu <cadariu(dot)mircea(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Frédéric Yhuel <frederic(dot)yhuel(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Benoit Lobréau <benoit(dot)lobreau(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Pierrick Chovelon <pierrick(dot)chovelon(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] temporary file usage report with extended protocol and unnamed portals
Date: 2025-10-24 11:34:56
Message-ID: 61382e11-7ae3-473e-8824-eba1b07e0cc6@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17/10/2025 00:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, and the other members are not complaining as far as I can see, so
> we should be clear in terms of the tests. Now, back to the main
> issue..

So far so good!

About the main issue, seems to me the consensus is that dropping unnamed
portals more aggressively is the way to go?

Kind regards,

Mircea Cadariu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-10-24 11:48:22 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2025-10-24 11:23:53 Re: Unicode 17