Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date: 2025-10-06 10:44:10
Message-ID: CAN55FZ0806U7DboVN-AJQ0Tm=ssZKL8hKAbBp7OvWYT6e4GJ1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 11:54, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 06.10.25 10:29, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> >
> > I can work on this but I want to clarify it first. Which one do you prefer:
> >
> > 1- We won't have any command to do syntax checks (including tab and
> > nbsp), these checks will automatically run when we generate docs.
> >
> > 2- We will have a 'check' target but it will only do tab and nbsp
> > checks; xmllint will run only when generating the docs.
>
> I don't know, people have a lot of individual workflows, and they are
> not reading this thread. I still don't know what we are actually trying
> to fix here, I just noticed that what was committed is flawed.

The problem was meson build doesn't have tab and nbsp checks [1]. We
were trying to enable these checks on meson build by moving these
checks to the perl script so that we can run this script on both build
systems.

> I would prefer that b2922562726 be reverted, and then someone start a
> new thread with a descriptive change proposal.

Sounds good to me. I can create a new thread if it gets reverted.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7020df24-1d5f-41e5-8948-2e8d5da57935%40dunslane.net

--
Regards,
Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Microsoft

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2025-10-06 11:03:42 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Filip Janus 2025-10-06 09:58:59 Re: [PATCH] Better Performance for PostgreSQL with large INSERTs