Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date: 2025-10-06 11:55:47
Message-ID: e1f6f2e3-afeb-4f9e-aa8f-974d1fbeff28@dunslane.net
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-10-06 Mo 6:44 AM, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 11:54, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> On 06.10.25 10:29, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
>>> I can work on this but I want to clarify it first. Which one do you prefer:
>>>
>>> 1- We won't have any command to do syntax checks (including tab and
>>> nbsp), these checks will automatically run when we generate docs.
>>>
>>> 2- We will have a 'check' target but it will only do tab and nbsp
>>> checks; xmllint will run only when generating the docs.
>> I don't know, people have a lot of individual workflows, and they are
>> not reading this thread. I still don't know what we are actually trying
>> to fix here, I just noticed that what was committed is flawed.
> The problem was meson build doesn't have tab and nbsp checks [1]. We
> were trying to enable these checks on meson build by moving these
> checks to the perl script so that we can run this script on both build
> systems.
>
>> I would prefer that b2922562726 be reverted, and then someone start a
>> new thread with a descriptive change proposal.
> Sounds good to me. I can create a new thread if it gets reverted.
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7020df24-1d5f-41e5-8948-2e8d5da57935%40dunslane.net

OK, reverted.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2025-10-06 12:06:08 Re: Fix misuse use of window_gettupleslot function (src/backend/executor/nodeWindowAgg.c)
Previous Message Jingtang Zhang 2025-10-06 11:39:18 Lock tag of relation extend lock