From: | Filip Janus <fjanus(at)redhat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Philipp Marek <philipp(at)marek(dot)priv(dot)at> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Better Performance for PostgreSQL with large INSERTs |
Date: | 2025-10-06 09:58:59 |
Message-ID: | CAFjYY+KAkCRVpxyghe+1STnH-AOMH+0Nje5jDfeKa8L9WzU-EA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
7% is an interesting improvement for these cases. I see it as a nice
feature,
What about adding a GUC variable to have the ability to configure
PQ_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE based on the user's needs?
-Filip-
út 30. 9. 2025 v 10:42 odesílatel Philipp Marek <philipp(at)marek(dot)priv(dot)at>
napsal:
> Here's the patch again, this time with a 128kB buffer size.
>
> This gives us nearly the same gains (~7%) for the blob INSERTs,
> and the additional memory usage (120kB) shouldn't really matter,
> with "temp_buffer"s 8MB and "work_mem" 4MB defaults.
>
> Making it configurable would give a much more complex patch --
> so I suggest just using this fixed size.
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c b/src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c
> index 25f739a6..72d092b2 100644
> --- a/src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c
> +++ b/src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c
> @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static List *sock_paths = NIL;
> */
>
> #define PQ_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 8192
> -#define PQ_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 8192
> +#define PQ_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE (128 * 1024)
>
> static char *PqSendBuffer;
> static int PqSendBufferSize; /* Size send buffer */
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2025-10-06 10:44:10 | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Previous Message | jian he | 2025-10-06 09:48:53 | Re: speedup COPY TO for partitioned table. |