Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+
Date: 2026-04-20 06:46:09
Message-ID: CAHut+PuTH35hTKaP_+wuUepAbuWC2YLizG1aqxjvJP_fPBFFVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >
> > PSA v3 patches.
> >
> > v3-0001 - Fixed the TABLE describe footer titles as suggested.
> > - "Included in publications:"
> > - "Excluded from publications:"
> >
> > v3-0002 - Made similar footer title changes for SEQUENCE describe
> >
> > v3-0003 - Made similar footer title changes for SHCEMA describe. In
> > passing, I found that this \dn describe output was not even being
> > tested, so I added the missing regression test.
>
> I'm not sure separate patches are necessary for this change; it might
> be better to merge them into a single patch. Other than that, the
> changes look good.
>

I separated them because only the changes to TABLE \d had previously
been discussed.

If everyone thinks all changes are good, then I can combine them into one patch.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-04-20 07:14:25 Re: DOCS - CREATE PUBLICATION ... EXCEPT missing details on ONLY
Previous Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-04-20 06:41:45 Re: [PATCH] postmaster: fix stale PM_STARTUP comment