Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+

On Mon, 20 Apr 2026 at 08:27, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 3:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 4:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 12:10 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2026-Apr-10, Peter Smith wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > # -- describe the tables
> > > > > # \d t1
> > > > > Table "public.t1"
> > > > > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> > > > > --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> > > > > a | integer | | |
> > > > > Except Publications:
> > > > > "pub1"
> > > >
> > > > I have a hard time understanding what an "except publication" is. I
> > > > think this would be clearer if the header said "Excluded from publications:"
> > > >
> > >
> > > I agree that your suggestion is clearer.
> > >
> > > If we make that change, then should the "Publications:" footer also be
> > > modified similarly (to "Included in publications:") so they match?
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > CURRENTLY
> > >
> > > test_pub=# \d t1
> > > Table "public.t1"
> > > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> > > --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> > > a | integer | | |
> > > Publications:
> > > "pub1"
> > > "pub2"
> > > Except publications:
> > > "pub3"
> > >
> > > ~~~
> > >
> > > SUGGESTION
> > >
> > > test_pub=# \d t1
> > > Table "public.t1"
> > > Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
> > > --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------
> > > a | integer | | |
> > > Included in publications:
> > > "pub1"
> > > "pub2"
> > > Excluded from publications:
> > > "pub3"
> > >
> > > ~~~
> > >
> >
> > +1 for the proposal. It makes the description clear.
> >
>
> PSA v3 patches.
>
> v3-0001 - Fixed the TABLE describe footer titles as suggested.
> - "Included in publications:"
> - "Excluded from publications:"
>
> v3-0002 - Made similar footer title changes for SEQUENCE describe
>
> v3-0003 - Made similar footer title changes for SHCEMA describe. In
> passing, I found that this \dn describe output was not even being
> tested, so I added the missing regression test.

I'm not sure separate patches are necessary for this change; it might
be better to merge them into a single patch. Other than that, the
changes look good.

Regards,
Vignesh