| From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - CREATE PUBLICATION ... EXCEPT missing details on ONLY |
| Date: | 2026-04-20 07:14:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAHut+Psw4ZPeUxd3Pyhk3Zq7yJ1hYgpohW1D3qUdS1CeZXA1_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 3:45 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 5:44 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 8:44 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 5:26 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Currently, the EXCEPT (TABLE ...) part mentions how 'ONLY' and '*'
> > > > work for inheritance tables, but how they have no effect for
> > > > partitioned tables [1].
> > > >
> > > > It seems we accidentally missed saying that these also have no effect
> > > > for *regular* tables.
> > > >
> > >
> > > The sentence you quoted speaks about partitioned tables specifically,
> > > so not mentioning regular tables there seems reasonable to me.
> > >
> >
> > I think you missed my point.
> >
>
> No, I understood the point but didn't find it useful to add this to
> regular tables because they won't have children in any form.
>
Because regular tables won't have children in any form, a user could
reasonably worry that saying ONLY or `*` might give a runtime error or
a warning. There is no documentation to say otherwise. The patch
addresses that gap.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | lakshmi | 2026-04-20 07:18:48 | Re: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.” |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2026-04-20 06:46:09 | Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+ |