On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 1:58 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 4:28 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:00:20PM +0300, Ekaterina Kiryanova wrote:
> >
> > > Another point worth mentioning is that only this file contains the phrase
> > > "two-phase transaction". I believe that "two-phase commit transaction" or
> > > "transaction prepared for two-phase commit" depending on the situation would
> > > be better wording.
> >
> > "Prepare for two-phase commit" may be clearer?
> >
>
> I think we can use just "Prepared transaction" instead. So, the
> message "The user defined GID of the two-phase transaction." can be
> changed to "The user defined GID of the prepared transaction.".
> Similarly, the message "Identifies the message as a two-phase prepared
> transaction message." could be changed to: "Identifies the message as
> a prepared transaction message."
>
> > > And finally, could you please clarify this part?
> > > -- The end LSN of the prepare transaction.
> > > Is it a typo of "prepared transaction"?
>
> I think in this case it should be a "prepared transaction".
>
>
> Thanks for the report and Thanks Michael for including me. I am just
> redirecting it to -hackers so that others involved in this feature
> also can share their views.
>
PSA a patch to modify the descriptions as suggested by Amit.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia