| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ekaterina Kiryanova <e(dot)kiryanova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml |
| Date: | 2022-08-03 10:53:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20220803105315.cha5qmfvbe6zsd6l@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 2022-Aug-03, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Thanks for the report and Thanks Michael for including me. I am just
> redirecting it to -hackers so that others involved in this feature
> also can share their views.
I'm sorry, but our policy is that crossposts are not allowed. I think
this policy is bad, precisely because it prevents legitimate cases like
this one; but it is what it is.
I think we should change the policy, not back to allow indiscriminate
cross-posting, but to allow some limited form of it. For example I
think pg-bugs+pg-hackers and pg-docs+pg-hackers should be allowed
combinations. Just saying.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2022-08-03 13:29:58 | The sample FDW table: pglog not work in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/file-fdw.html |
| Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2022-08-03 05:26:25 | Re: PostgreSQL 15 minor fixes in protocol.sgml |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-08-03 10:58:04 | Re: [PATCH] postgresql.conf.sample comment alignment. |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Koterov | 2022-08-03 09:10:08 | Re: Does having pg_last_wal_replay_lsn[replica] >= pg_current_wal_insert_lsn[master] guarantee that the replica is caught up? |