| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
| Date: | 2019-02-03 11:58:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=1B61wrvZ2OMCFtEKemjSbUA8bje0qAX5s82c6LOOuAkg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:12 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's a new version. I did some cosmetic clean-up, and I dropped the
> > changes to pg_controldata output, replication epoch/xid processing
> > code and various similar non-essential changes. For this patch I want
> > just the new type + next xid generator + appropriate conversions.
> >
> > I propose that we get this committed early in the cycle. That'd
> > maximise testing time in the tree, fix the bug identified by Amit, and
> > leave plenty of time for later patches to use FullTransactionId in
> > more places as appropriate.
>
> Then probably it's the good time to do so. Any opinions or more reviews here?
> I'll move it to the next CF for now.
If there are no objections, I'm planning to do a round of testing and
commit this shortly.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2019-02-03 12:33:38 | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-02-03 11:56:29 | Re: Shared Memory: How to use SYSV rather than MMAP ? |