Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current
Date: 2018-11-29 13:13:30
Message-ID: CA+q6zcV64ydpeiGfkpNSoQoV06dYpB7P+F7QpzeZCENgchEpsQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:25 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Here's a new version. I did some cosmetic clean-up, and I dropped the
> changes to pg_controldata output, replication epoch/xid processing
> code and various similar non-essential changes. For this patch I want
> just the new type + next xid generator + appropriate conversions.
>
> I propose that we get this committed early in the cycle. That'd
> maximise testing time in the tree, fix the bug identified by Amit, and
> leave plenty of time for later patches to use FullTransactionId in
> more places as appropriate.

Then probably it's the good time to do so. Any opinions or more reviews here?
I'll move it to the next CF for now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-11-29 13:27:07 Re: New GUC to sample log queries
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-29 13:11:11 Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?