| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Usage of epoch in txid_current |
| Date: | 2019-02-04 05:43:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20190204054344.GR29064@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 10:58:02PM +1100, Thomas Munro wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'm planning to do a round of testing and
> commit this shortly.
Hm. That looks sane to me at quick glance. I am a bit on the edge
regaring the naming "FullTransactionId", which is actually a 64-bit
value with a 32-bit XID and a 32-bit epoch. Something like
TransactionIdWithEpoch or EpochTransactionId sounds a bit better to
me. My point is that "Full" is too generic for that.
Moved to next CF for now.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-02-04 05:46:57 | Re: Synchronous replay take III |
| Previous Message | Edmund Horner | 2019-02-04 05:37:33 | Re: Tid scan improvements |