| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Date: | 2016-01-11 11:31:20 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEyCSodN2UQ0Xp-RQfhsgPKwpQZXy9HY6VysuG2YopVrEw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 01/10/2016 06:19 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> No arguments with what was written above.
+1. Very well written.
>
>
> If we had an "issue" tracker rather than a bug tracker, I'd expect a
>> lot more unproductive bickering.
>>
>
> This I disagree with. It wouldn't be any worse than we have now. An issue
> tracker (if it is a good one) becomes the forum, whether you use an email
> or web interface. So expect at least as much banter as there is on lists
> but with a much easier management interface.
>
>
We can argue about if it's actually an easier management interface ;)
I'd agree with Robert in that it will cause some more such bickering -- but
only because the discussions become visible to a new group of people as
well. That's not necessarily a bad thing. But thinking that having such an
issue tracker is actually going to help *get rid of* the pointless part of
things is a nice dream, but just a dream. The only advantage I can see of
it is to increase the visibility of them.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-01-11 11:36:44 | Re: Why doesn't src/backend/port/win32/socket.c implement bind()? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-11 11:14:10 | Re: Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations |