Re: Improve docs for n_distinct_inherited

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve docs for n_distinct_inherited
Date: 2025-10-13 20:29:40
Message-ID: CAApHDvqdcFg2hheSckBVLo5fx-x=VpFUTs5gg199cDQhiRvK+A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 at 00:55, David G. Johnston
<david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> WFM. Since we allow 0 as an input I’m not convinced we should remove that sentence, though I concur that using reset is preferred.

I've pushed the v5 version. Thanks to both of you for looking.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-10-13 20:30:52 Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration?
Previous Message Arseniy Mukhin 2025-10-13 20:24:44 Re: Remove custom redundant full page write description from GIN