| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration? |
| Date: | 2025-10-13 20:30:52 |
| Message-ID: | aO1hfONHrPXEJ3an@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Robert Haas
> So you support calling it libpq.so.5 forever, no matter how much we change?
I would say SONAME/ABI/API breakages are not a tool to promote better
SSL settings. If we want to move to sslmode=verify-full by default, we
should just do that. I don't see why adding extra ABI/API pain would
make that transition any better for users.
We can move to libpq6 if there are technical reasons, but the general
pain will be long-lasting until the whole world has caught up. (Debian
etc can switch pretty easily, but there's a gazillion of third-party
things.)
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-13 20:33:01 | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-10-13 20:29:40 | Re: Improve docs for n_distinct_inherited |