| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yuchen Li <liyuchen_xyz(at)163(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+ |
| Date: | 2026-04-22 11:27:10 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1J3DEx_Fez7QOPWJ5g4dA2osB6gq7WW6_7E6qkLmegTqg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 12:16 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> PSA v4, now combined as Vignesh suggested, and with the extra space also fixed.
>
I would like to explicitly mention in the commit message that "Tag for
included publications was a pre-existing behavior but it is better to
change it for making it consistent with excluded publications tag. So,
how about a commit message as follows: "psql: Improve describe footer
titles for publications.
The psql describe (`\d`) footer titles were previously unintuitive
when listing publications that included or excluded specific tables.
Even though the tag for included publications was pre-existing, it is
better to update it to "Included in publications:" to match the
phrasing of the "Excluded from publications:" tag.
Footer titles for sequence and schema descriptions have been updated
similarly to maintain consistency."
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2026-04-22 11:30:17 | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2026-04-22 11:26:43 | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. |