| From: | Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Koval <d(dot)koval(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. |
| Date: | 2026-04-22 11:30:17 |
| Message-ID: | ba3bef38-76db-46e7-bb22-5260207fb86d@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/04/26 08:24, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the partitioned
>>> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the old
>>> +-- partition).
>>> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x);
>>> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, part_extdep_3)
>>> + INTO part_extdep_merged2;
>>> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class
>>> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname;
>>
>> Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON logic.
>
> I've added the dependency on this index to check index disappears with
> its dependency. I think this would make this test more relevant.
>
> Kirill, Matheus, are you ok with these change?
>
It works for me.
--
Matheus Alcantara
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-04-22 11:32:01 | Re: Skipping schema changes in publication |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-04-22 11:27:10 | Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+ |