Re: EXCEPT TABLE - Case inconsistency for describe \d and \dRp+

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 6:50 PM Yuchen Li <liyuchen_xyz(at)163(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 4/20/2026 2:46 PM, Peter Smith wrote:
> >>> PSA v3 patches.
> >>>
> >>> v3-0001 - Fixed the TABLE describe footer titles as suggested.
> >>> - "Included in publications:"
> >>> - "Excluded from publications:"
> >>>
> >>> v3-0002 - Made similar footer title changes for SEQUENCE describe
> >>>
> >>> v3-0003 - Made similar footer title changes for SHCEMA describe. In
> >>> passing, I found that this \dn describe output was not even being
> >>> tested, so I added the missing regression test.
> >> I'm not sure separate patches are necessary for this change; it might
> >> be better to merge them into a single patch. Other than that, the
> >> changes look good.
> >>
> > I separated them because only the changes to TABLE \d had previously
> > been discussed.
> >
> > If everyone thinks all changes are good, then I can combine them into one patch.
> >
> > ======
> > Kind Regards,
> > Peter Smith.
> > Fujitsu Australia.
> >
> While reviewing 0003, I noticed a formatting issue in the following line:
>
> + * schema mapping count + 1 (for storing NULL).
>
> There is an extra space after "count +".
>

PSA v4, now combined as Vignesh suggested, and with the extra space also fixed.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.