> On 2 April 2018 at 11:27, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:41:12AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> I found this bug, when working on presentation about FTS and it looked
>> annoying, since it validates
>> the consistency of FTS.I think this is a bug, which needs to be fixed,
>> else inconsistency with existing full text search will be gets
>> deeper.
>>
>> The fix looks trivial, but needs a review, of course.
>
> Oh, I understood. The code looks good, tests passed. But maybe it is
> better to use NumericGetDatum() instead of PointerGetDatum()?
Well, technically speaking they're the same, but yes, NumericGetDatum would be
more precise. I've modified it in the attached patch.