Re: Pluggable toaster

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pluggable toaster
Date: 2022-04-04 16:39:53
Message-ID: CA+Tgmobhqw4kr5wZaA08_XJirZzgfohtR0BOgB2UNRTOcnjLmQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 12:13 PM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm really sorry. Messed up some code while merging rebased branches with previous (v1)
> patches issued in December and haven't noticed that seg fault because of corrupted code
> while running check-world.
> I've fixed messed code in Dummy Toaster package and checked twice - all's correct now,
> patches are applied correctly and tests are clean.
> Thank you for pointing out the error and for your patience!

Hi,

This patch set doesn't seem anywhere close to committable to me. For example:

- It apparently adds a new command called CREATE TOASTER but that
command doesn't seem to be documented anywhere.

- contrib/dummy_toaster is added in patch 1 with a no implementation
and code comments that say "Bloom index utilities" and then those
comments are fixed and an implementation is added in later patches.

- What is supposedly patch 1 is actually 32 patch files concatenated
together. It doesn't apply properly either with 'patch' or 'git am' so
I don't understand what we would even do with this.

- None of these patches have appropriate commit messages.

- Many of these patches add 'XXX' comments or errors or other
obviously unfinished bits of code. Some of this may be cleaned up by
later patches but it's hard to tell because right now one can't even
apply the patch set properly. Even if that were possible, it's the job
of the person submitting the patch to organize the patch into
independent, separately committable chunks that are self-contained and
have good comments and good commit messages for each one.

I don't think based on the status of this patch set that it's even
possible to provide useful feedback on the design at this point, never
mind getting anything committed.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-04 16:39:59 Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-04 16:33:52 Re: JSON constructors and window functions