Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-04-04 16:39:59
Message-ID: 1916714.1649090399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> I think the fundamental instability here is that this TAP test is
> setting shared_buffers small enough to allow the syncscan logic
> to kick in where it does not in normal testing. Maybe we should
> just disable syncscan in this test script?

Did that, we'll see how much it helps.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-04-04 17:03:10 Re: New Object Access Type hooks
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-04-04 16:39:53 Re: Pluggable toaster