Re: JSON constructors and window functions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: JSON constructors and window functions
Date: 2022-04-04 16:33:52
Message-ID: 20220404163352.hmbd6isaxltlgu4d@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2022-04-04 11:54:23 -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Are we missing regression tests using these functions as window functions?

So far, yes.

ISTM that 4eb97988796 should have at least included the crashing statement as
a test... The statement can be simpler too:

SELECT json_objectagg(k : v with unique keys) OVER (ORDER BY k) FROM (VALUES (1,1), (2,2)) a(k,v);

is sufficient to trigger the crash for me, without even using asan (after
reverting the bugfix, of course).

> Hm. I suppose it's possible to write a general purpose regression test
> that loops over all aggregate functions and runs them as window
> functions and aggregates over the same data sets and compares results.
> At least for the case of aggregate functions with a single parameter
> belonging to a chosen set of data types.

I was wondering about that too. Hardest part would be to come up with values
to pass to the aggregates.

I don't think it'd help in this case though, since it depends on special case
grammar stuff to even be reached. json_objectagg(k : v with unique
keys). "Normal" use of aggregates can't even reach the problematic path
afaics.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-04-04 16:39:53 Re: Pluggable toaster
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2022-04-04 16:31:41 Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs