| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |
| Date: | 2018-01-04 17:59:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaG06D3tGUC+Xq_tjfTa6ZkTBL_yBq8tystTWYxWZjmGg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Thanks. I think now we can proceed with
>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>>> nodes.
>>
>> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>
> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
> v9.6. I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
> option for Explain.
This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now
committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maksim Milyutin | 2018-01-04 18:06:09 | Re: [HACKERS] wrong t_bits alignment in pageinspect |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-04 17:51:53 | Re: Announcing Release 6 of PostgreSQL Buildfarm client |