Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks. I think now we can proceed with
>>>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>>>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>>>> nodes.
>>>
>>> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>>
>> Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
>> v9.6. I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
>> the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
>> option for Explain.
>
> This thread got lost in my inbox over Christmas, but I've now
> committed this back-port to REL9_6_STABLE.
>

Thanks!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com