| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hubert Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze output with parallel workers - question about meaning of information for explain.depesz.com |
| Date: | 2017-12-20 08:38:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KT3BYj50qWhK5qBF=LDzQCoUVSFZjcK3mHoJJeWA+fNA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks. I think now we can proceed with
>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>> nodes.
>
> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>
Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
v9.6. I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
option for Explain.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_pgv96.1.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Huong Dangminh | 2017-12-20 08:39:46 | RE: User defined data types in Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-12-20 08:27:20 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |