| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) |
| Date: | 2017-07-20 15:48:00 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaDtzTC02gx2E_w1mh7eAaaJ_ONJadu0AQGUrgSMou8Kw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> During this week, I read documentation and source code of BRIN index to
> understand its implementation.
> But later I found out that it is unlikely to implement page level or tuple
> level predicate locking in BRIN index.
> In this week, I also fixed a small issue and updated my previous patch for
> gin index. Currently, I am working on
> sp-gist index.
>
It's a shame that nobody seems to be answering emails like this, but you
also haven't provided much detail here - e.g. *why* is BRIN unlikely to
work out well? I think I know the answer, but it'd be good to spell out
your thoughts on the subject, I think.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-20 15:51:55 | Re: Increase Vacuum ring buffer. |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2017-07-20 15:41:51 | Re: JSONB - JSONB operator feature request |