Re: JSONB - JSONB operator feature request

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, david(dot)turon(at)linuxbox(dot)cz, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JSONB - JSONB operator feature request
Date: 2017-07-20 15:41:51
Message-ID: CA+q6zcX0YY8Xj+b8aLBri7Kb8N5V7rg_BM7h0gWwWTiHJvznLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 20 July 2017 at 16:24, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>
> If we can agree to a definition, we can make this go. My vague
> memories from graph theory indicate that that "agree to a definition"
> part is the real problem to be solved.

I tried to embody some relevant thoughts in this thread [1], I think it
would be great if
you can take a look and suggest something more.

[1]:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+q6zcU+gy1+dxQD09MSz8Zwqq+sPPfS-6GYKmyNqGVQDFeQbg@mail.gmail.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-07-20 15:48:00 Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7)
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2017-07-20 15:09:49 Re: Increase Vacuum ring buffer.