| From: | Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) |
| Date: | 2017-07-18 14:36:01 |
| Message-ID: | CALxAEPsGSA788Zy3DQUjquFG4+bnvWWxZUpO6VA0GA116x0s=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree
Hi,
During this week, I read documentation and source code of BRIN index to
understand its implementation.
But later I found out that it is unlikely to implement page level or tuple
level predicate locking in BRIN index.
In this week, I also fixed a small issue and updated my previous patch for
gin index. Currently, I am working on
sp-gist index.
Regards,
Shubham
<https://mailtrack.io/> Sent with Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com&idSignature=22>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2017-07-18 16:24:41 | Re: JSONB - JSONB operator feature request |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-18 14:10:49 | Re: [PATCH] Make sure all statistics is sent after a few DML are performed |