From: | Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, konstantin knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Possible bug in logical replication. |
Date: | 2018-07-03 06:16:42 |
Message-ID: | 87po04j12t.fsf@ars-thinkpad |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 07:31:20PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Could it be possible to get a patch from all the feedback and exchange
>> gathered here? Petr, I think that it would not hurt if you use the set
>> of words and comments you think is most adapted as the primary author of
>> the feature.
>
> I have seen no patch, so attached is one to finally close the loop and
> this open item, which includes both my suggestions and what Arseny has
> mentioned based on the latest emails exchanged. Any objections to that?
I'm practically happy with this.
> * while confirmed_lsn is used as base point for the decoding context.
This line is excessive as now we have comment below saying it doesn't
matter.
--
Arseny Sher
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-07-03 06:29:36 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-07-03 06:16:40 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |