| From: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| Date: | 2018-07-03 06:16:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAKJS1f8h8283Vb2NcQH+YOMErdDQZWGuqGoe-gX6yT8TKGf0MA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 3 July 2018 at 18:11, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 06:00:46PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> I think it should be backpatched to v11 and v10. Your original commit
>> went there too. I don't see any reason to do any different here than
>> what you did with the original commit.
>
> expand_partitioned_rtentry is new as of v11. Or you mean to tweak
> expand_inherited_rtentry() perhaps? I am not sure that it is worth it
> as the code has already diverged between 10 and 11.
Oh right. I'd forgotten that changed in v11. I think the v10 code is
fine as is then.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-07-03 06:29:36 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-03 06:11:19 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arseny Sher | 2018-07-03 06:16:42 | Re: Possible bug in logical replication. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-07-03 06:11:19 | Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees |