Re: Offering tuned config files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Offering tuned config files
Date: 2003-02-14 15:07:45
Message-ID: 7050.1045235265@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> writes:
> In postgresql.conf.sample-writeheavy you have:
> commit_delay = 10000
> Is this still needed with "ganged WAL writes"? Tom?

I doubt that the current options for grouped commits are worth anything
at the moment. Chris, do you have any evidence backing up using
commit_delay with 7.3?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2003-02-14 15:59:12 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:05:44 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2003-02-14 15:10:03 Re: location of the configuration files
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-02-14 15:07:32 Re: location of the configuration files

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message johnnnnnn 2003-02-14 16:33:14 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:05:44 Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)