Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tuning scenarios (was Changing the default configuration)
Date: 2003-02-14 15:05:44
Message-ID: 7027.1045235144@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... But those same
>> limitations cause the results to be unstable from run to run, which
>> is why I don't have a lot of faith in reports of pgbench numbers.
>> You need to work quite hard to get reproducible numbers out of it.

> The interesting question is whether that's more an indictment of how
> PG does things or how pg_bench does things.

I didn't draw a conclusion on that ;-). I merely pointed out that the
numbers are unstable, and therefore not to be trusted without a great
deal of context ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:07:45 Re: Offering tuned config files
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2003-02-14 15:05:22 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-02-14 15:07:32 Re: location of the configuration files
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2003-02-14 15:05:22 Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default configuration

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:07:45 Re: Offering tuned config files
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-14 14:30:30 Re: WAL replay logic (was Re: Mount options for Ext3?)