| From: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'David Steele' <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Date: | 2021-04-06 11:48:00 |
| Message-ID: | OSBPR01MB4888FD66D0AA83944DEFC554ED769@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 8:44 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> > On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> >> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced, but it was not
> >> necessary.
> >> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
> >
> > So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
> > If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version
> > at first.
> > Then we can improve the docs if required.
>
> +1
Yes, please. What I suggested is almost same as your idea.
Thank you for your confirmation.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-04-06 11:58:25 | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2021-04-06 11:44:13 | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |