| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "david(at)pgmasters(dot)net" <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data |
| Date: | 2021-04-06 11:13:49 |
| Message-ID: | d4dc656f-8eab-ecf2-4ad4-b4d4e1b317e1@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
> but it was not necessary.
> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at first.
Then we can improve the docs if required.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2021-04-06 11:19:26 | Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function |
| Previous Message | Pavel Borisov | 2021-04-06 11:09:59 | Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index |