effective_cache_size vs units

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-18 20:45:43
Message-ID: 4586FDF7.5050106@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such for
effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Miller 2006-12-18 20:53:25 Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-18 20:33:57 Re: Notify enhancement