Re: effective_cache_size vs units

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units
Date: 2006-12-18 21:08:31
Message-ID: 200612182208.32184.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such
> for effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers?

You can't use "Mb" or "Gb" for shared_buffers either, because those are
not accepted units.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-18 21:09:21 Re: 8.2.0 Tarball vs. REL8_2_0 vs. REL8_2_STABLE
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-18 21:06:24 Re: Typo in pg_dump documentation and new suggestion for Release Notes