From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Johan Wehtje <joweht(at)tpgi(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Matthew Peter <survivedsushi(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
Date: | 2005-10-15 14:04:09 |
Message-ID: | 43510C59.5070702@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Johan Wehtje wrote:
> I doubt you read the rest of the post otherwise I don't think you
> would make that comment.
Personlly I think you were right. Access is a good front end, at least
in the sense that it is a hell of a lot better
than anything the OSS community has bothered to come up with. I actually
Paradox is a better choice :).
It is also a front-end that customers are comfortable with.
>
> I think there really is a need for a rich DB client that allows Rapid
> development and is easy to link to an office Suite. To be useful to a
> business a database needs the applications built on top of it, and
> like I said if someone can show me a quicker way of doing this than
> Access and still lets me use Postgresql for my backend without any
> great drama, I would love to hear of it. My experience with Access
> 2000 and the latest ODBC drivers has been very positive, but I am wary
> of Microsoft's intentions for Access going forward, which I why I
> asked if anyone knew of a really viable alternative that I have not
> tried.
FYI Open Office 2.0 database, forms, reports etc... is MUCH better than
it was. I believe you can script it as well in Python and maybe Java.
>
> The next best thing that I have tried is Delphi with some of the
> libraries available from Sqlmanager or Active Query builder.
You can use Kylix for that but I don't know its status.
>
> But really, for most of the situations I encounter this is a bit like
> re-inventing the wheel every time someone wants a cart built. You end
> up trying to build an Access like application from the ground up every
> time someone wants a Db app. And that seems to me to be taking
> antipathy towards Microsoft to a point where it benefits no-one.
>
> Cheers
> Johan Wehtje
>
> Matthew Peter wrote:
>
>> Someone trying to stick microsoft yet another place
>> they don't belong.
>>
>> --- Johan Wehtje <joweht(at)tpgi(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>>
>>> Very much a description of the Business I am in.
>>>
>>> For all the criticism leveled at it, I still think
>>> that as a rich Database Client that permits really rapid
>>> development of Database driven applications Access is unbeatable.
>>> Pair it with a
>>> good Database server and it is the perfect combination.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over
>> 1 million songs. Try it free.
>> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>>
>> .
>>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-15 14:06:26 | Re: Open source database comparison |
Previous Message | Johan Wehtje | 2005-10-15 13:13:02 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-10-15 14:06:48 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-10-15 13:31:08 | Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas |