Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Thomas Beutin <tb(at)laokoon(dot)in-berlin(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-15 14:06:48
Message-ID: 43510CF8.6020103@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/15/2005 6:22 AM, Thomas Beutin wrote:

> Maybe they lost the development of the know how for the only transaction
> safe table type of the current mysql releases, but they still "own" the
> former Adabas/MaxDB/SAP-DB code with transaction safe tables. Probably
> they force the "union" of mysql and SAP-DB code base to keep their
> transaction competence, but this are just my €0,02...

First, InnoDB is not the only transaction safe table type in MySQL.
Although a poor stepchild today, there is still BDB.

Second, MySQL AB does not own the MaxDB code. I never fully understood
what that contract was about, maybe someone from MySQL AB can explain
that, but to my knowledge SAP AG did not transfer the copyright.

They could also go back to NuSphere, aka Multera, aka PeerDirect and ask
what happened to the Progress storage engine Rocket.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-15 14:24:08 Re: Equivalent queries and the planner
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-15 14:04:09 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?