Re: PXGS vs TAP tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PXGS vs TAP tests
Date: 2021-06-20 17:24:04
Message-ID: 33c29638-5037-6a20-a46a-d802c4b2f67e@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 6/20/21 10:56 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 6/20/21 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> I removed the REGRESS_SHLIB setting altogether for the PGXS case - it's
>>> not clear to me why we need it in a TAP test recipe at all.
>> After some digging in the git history, it looks like it's there because
>> of Noah's c09850992, which makes me wonder whether 017_shm.pl requires
>> it. If so, it'd make more sense perhaps for that one test script
>> to set up the environment variable than to have it cluttering every TAP
>> run.
>
> Yeah, I'll do some testing.
>
>
>

Tests pass with the attached patch, which puts the setting in the
Makefile for the recovery tests. The script itself doesn't need any
changing.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
tap-makefile-fix2.patch text/x-patch 2.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2021-06-20 18:15:08 Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-06-20 17:19:31 Re: Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()