Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans
Date: 2018-06-29 22:12:38
Message-ID: 27082.1530310358@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I'm CCing Tom here, as author of the patch that caused (most of) the
> issue.

Uh ... me? I thought this was a parallel-query issue, which I've
pretty much not been involved in.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-06-29 22:17:08 Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-06-29 22:02:07 Re: Tips on committing