Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline (libpq_pipeline.c)

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: d(dot)kovalenko(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline (libpq_pipeline.c)
Date: 2025-09-03 17:06:02
Message-ID: 202509031706.ojnhzuyakuo4@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2025-Sep-03, Tom Lane wrote:

> Hm, I chose that name by analogy to the adjacent
> confirm_query_canceled(), which is likewise consuming a result.
> I agree that "consume" is a better verb, but then let's rename
> confirm_query_canceled as well.

Ah, that explains it -- my bad, then, I suppose. That change works for
me.

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand
relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of
whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan)
https://postgr.es/m/20050809113420.GD2768@phlogiston.dyndns.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-09-03 19:09:00 Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore
Previous Message 李海洋 (陌痕) 2025-09-03 16:59:10 回复:Re: BUG #19040: Memory leak in hashed subplan node due to missing hashtempcxt reset