Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline (libpq_pipeline.c)

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> writes:
> On 2025-Jun-21, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Here's a shot at improving matters. I also made an effort
>> at cleaning up memory leaks in libpq_pipeline.c, although
>> that's surely neatnik-ism not anything meaningful.

> Yeah, the code looks much better this way. I thought it was a bit odd
> that a function called confirm_result_status() would actually consume
> said status. Would it be better as
> consume_result_status(PGconn *conn, ExecStatusType expected)
> ?

Hm, I chose that name by analogy to the adjacent
confirm_query_canceled(), which is likewise consuming a result.
I agree that "consume" is a better verb, but then let's rename
confirm_query_canceled as well.

> I think the patch is a clear improvement regardless.

Thanks for reviewing!

regards, tom lane